Populations	Interventions	Comparators	Outcomes
Individuals: With suspected lactase insufficiency	Interventions of interest are: Targeted testing for the MCM6-13910C>T variant	Comparators of interest are: Dietary restrictions	Relevant outcomes include: Symptoms Morbid events Functional outcomes Quality of life

Background

Lactase
The predominant carbohydrate in milk is the disaccharide, lactose, comprising the simple sugars, glucose,and galactose. The brush-border enzyme, lactase (also called lactase-phlorizin hydrolase), hydrolyzes lactose into its monosaccharide components, which are absorbable by the intestinal mucosa. Except in rare instances of congenital hypolactasia, most infants can produce lactase, and enzyme levels are highest at birth. Sometime after weaning in most children, there is a decrease in lactase production through a multifactorial process that is regulated at the gene transcription level.^1,

The decrease in lactase level varies significantly by ethnic group both in terms of the lowest level of lactase and time from weaning necessary to reach the nadir of lactase activity.^2,By 2 to 12 years of age, 2 groups emerge: a group with insufficient levels of lactase activity (primary hypolactasia or lactase nonpersistence) and a group that retains the infant level of lactase activity through adulthood (lactase persistence).^3, Ethnic groups with the highest prevalences of lactase insufficiency are Asian, Native Americans, and blacks, with the lowest prevalences in people of northern European origin (see Table 1).

Table 1. Prevalence of Lactase Insufficiency by Ethnicity

Populations	Percent Lactase Insufficient,a %
Northern Europeans	2-15
American whites	6-22
Central Europeans	9-23
Northern Indians	20-30
Southern Indians	60-70
Hispanics	50-80
Ashkenazi Jews	60-80
Blacks	60-80
American Indians	80-100
Asians	95-100

Adapted from Sahi (1994).^4,
a Identified through hydrogen breath test or lactose tolerance blood test.

Several terms are used to describe lactose malabsorption: lactase insufficiency, lactose malabsorption, and lactose intolerance. We discuss each below.

Lactase Insufficiency

Lactase insufficiency (lactase nonpersistence or primary hypolactasia) indicates that lactase activity is a fraction of the original infantile level. Direct measurement of lactase activity is tested biochemically through duodenal biopsy.^5, Lactase insufficiency is highly correlated with the C/C genotype at -13910 in the lactase promoter region. In adults homozygous for the lactase persistence genotype (T/T), lactase levels are approximately 10 times higher than in those who are homozygous lactase insufficient (C/C); heterozygous persons (C/T) have intermediate lactase activity levels.^6, In heterozygous people, symptoms of lactose intolerance may appear if the quantity of ingested lactose exceeds the maximum digestible by the reduced level of lactase.

Lactose Malabsorption

Lactose malabsorption indicates that a large portion of lactose cannot be absorbed in the small bowel and is delivered to the colon. Malabsorption is tested by hydrogen breath test (HBT) or lactose tolerance blood test.^5,

Lactose Intolerance

Lactose intolerance indicates that lactose malabsorption causes gastrointestinal symptoms. There is no genetic test for lactose intolerance; demonstration of lactose intolerance requires patients to self-report symptoms (see Table 2) after lactose ingestion. Diagnosis of lactose intolerance is highly susceptible to the placebo effect, and studies should conduct a blinded lactose challenge with an indistinguishable placebo.^3,Jellema et al (2010) indicated in their meta-analysis that no specific patient complaint could predict lactose malabsorption; for common lactose intolerance symptoms, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0% to 90% and 18% to 96%, respectively.^7, Similarly, patient self-reported milk intolerance was inaccurate for predicting lactose malabsorption, with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 30% to 70% and 25% to 87%, respectively.

Table 2. Symptoms of Lactose Intolerance

Symptoms	Percent of Total Patients Who Experience Symptoms, %
Gut-related symptoms
Abdominal pain	100
Gut distension	100
Borborygmi (stomach rumbling)	100
Flatulence	100
Diarrhea	70
Nausea	78
Vomiting	78
Constipation	30
Systemic symptoms
Headache and lightheadedness	86
Loss of concentration and poor short-term memory	82
Muscle pain	71
Joint pain and/or swelling	71
Long-term fatigue	63
Allergy (eczema, pruritus, rhinitis, sinusitis, asthma)	40
Mouth ulcers	30
Heart arrhythmia	24
Increased frequency of micturition	<20
Sore throat	<20

Adapted from Matthews et al (2005).^2,

Symptoms

Lactase insufficiency is common, occurring in approximately 70% of persons after weaning.^8, Lactase insufficiency results in lactose malabsorption, which may lead to symptoms of lactose intolerance such as abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea, and increased flatulence, caused by bacterial fermentation of undigested lactose in the colon.^9, However, demonstration of lactose malabsorption does not necessarily indicate that a person will be symptomatic. Factors that determine whether a person with lactose malabsorption will develop symptoms include the dose of lactose ingested; residual intestinal lactase activity; ingestion of food along with lactose; the ability of the colonic flora to ferment lactose; and individual sensitivity to the products of lactose fermentation. Because of these factors, the number of persons reporting symptoms of lactose intolerance is likely only a portion of those who are lactase insufficient. Also, lactose malabsorption may be secondary (secondary hypolactasia) to acquired conditions, such as small bowel bacterial overgrowth; infectious enteritis; mucosal damage due to celiac disease; inflammatory bowel disease; antibiotics; gastrointestinal surgery; short bowel syndrome; radiation enteritis; or other conditions that may lead to reduced lactase expression in the small intestine.^6,

Clinical Diagnosis

Mucosal biopsy of the duodenum followed by biochemical lactase assay to directly measure lactase activity is the criterion standard for diagnosing lactase insufficiency. Although this approach also may exclude other causes of secondary lactose malabsorption, the utility is limited due to the invasiveness of the procedure and the patchy expression of lactase in the duodenum.

Two common alternatives to this direct method of measuring lactase activity are the HBT and the lactose tolerance blood test, which measure lactose malabsorption. Because lactose malabsorption is nearly always attributable to lactase insufficiency, insufficiency typically can be imputed from the assessment of lactose malabsorption.^3,

The HBT measures by gas chromatography the amount of hydrogen exhaled for up to 3 hours after ingesting 25 to 50 g of lactose. Persons undergoing HBT are required to fast overnight and refrain from activities that may elevate breath hydrogen during testing. A rise in breath hydrogen of 0.31 to 2.5 mL/min is indicative of bacterial fermentation from malabsorbed lactose. A negative HBT can exclude lactose malabsorption as the cause of symptoms, and a positive result indicates that symptoms may be attributable to lactose ingestion.^3, The following factors are associated with increased breath hydrogen and may cause false-positive results if present at the time of testing:

• Diabetes
• Small bowel disease (eg, celiac, giardiasis)
• Bacterial overgrowth
• Altered colon pH
• Antibiotic usage
• Probiotic usage
• Smoking
• Exercise
• Aspirin usage
• Colonic bacterial adaptation

• Diabetes
• Small bowel disease (eg, celiac, giardiasis)
• Thyroid disorders
• Motility disorders (stomach, small bowel)
• Bacterial overgrowth

Enattah et al (2002) identified the first DNA variant to control transcription of lactase.^10, This variant (MCM6 -13910C>T) is located in a noncoding region of the MCM6 gene that is upstream of the lactase gene (LCT). The less common T allele has been associated with lactase persistence and has demonstrated an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. This variant is thought to be related to the domestication of animals during the last 10,000 to 12,000 years, and persons with the C/C genotype have been shown to be associated strongly with a lactase insufficiency phenotype in whites. Other variants in the same MCM6 regulatory region are associated with other ethnic groups (eg, Africans, Arabs), but prevalence varies geographically^6,11, and, to date, no commercially available testing kits have incorporated these variants.

Prometheus’s LactoTYPE® is a commercially available polymerase chain reaction-based test that assesses the most common lactase nonpersistence variant (MCM6 -13910C>T) in patients with suspected lactose intolerance. Fulgent Clinical Diagnostics Lab also offers MCM6 sequencing as well as deletion and duplication analysis using next-generation sequencing. Demonstration of the C/C genotype can be used as indirect evidence of lactase insufficiency and lactose malabsorption.

Treatment

The goal of treatment should be to ensure adequate nutrition for skeletal health.^1, For patients with lactase insufficiency, dietary adjustment to restrict the consumption of foods containing lactose is the principal form of therapy. However, even lactose maldigesters can usually tolerate small amounts of lactose (12 g/d) with no or minimal symptoms. Lactase enzyme preparations are available for symptom relief but may not be effective in all patients.

Regulatory Status

Clinical laboratories may develop and validate tests in-house and market them as a laboratory service; laboratory-developed tests must meet the general regulatory standards of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). Laboratories that offer laboratory-developed tests must be licensed by the CLIA for high-complexity testing. To date, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has chosen not to require any regulatory review of this test.

Related Policies

• None

For Medicare Advantage, please refer to the Medicare Coverage Section below for coverage guidance.)

The use of targeted MCM6-13910C>T variant analysis for the prediction of lactase insufficiency is considered investigational.


Policy Guidelines: (Information to guide medical necessity determination based on the criteria contained within the policy statements above.)

Genetics Nomenclature Update

The Human Genome Variation Society nomenclature is used to report information on variants found in DNA and serves as an international standard in DNA diagnostics. It is being implemented for genetic testing medical policy updates starting in 2017 (see Table PG1). The Society’s nomenclature is recommended by the Human Variome Project, the Human Genome Organization, and by the Human Genome Variation Society itself.

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology standards and guidelines for interpretation of sequence variants represent expert opinion from both organizations, in addition to the College of American Pathologists. These recommendations primarily apply to genetic tests used in clinical laboratories, including genotyping, single genes, panels, exomes, and genomes. Table PG2 shows the recommended standard terminology-“pathogenic,” “likely pathogenic,” “uncertain significance,” “likely benign,” and “benign”-to describe variants identified that cause Mendelian disorders.

Table PG1. Nomenclature to Report on Variants Found in DNA

Previous	Updated	Definition
Mutation	Disease-associated variant	Disease-associated change in the DNA sequence
	Variant	Change in the DNA sequence
	Familial variant	Disease-associated variant identified in a proband for use in subsequent targeted genetic testing in first-degree relatives

Table PG2. ACMG-AMP Standards and Guidelines for Variant Classification

Variant Classification	Definition
Pathogenic	Disease-causing change in the DNA sequence
Likely pathogenic	Likely disease-causing change in the DNA sequence
Variant of uncertain significance	Change in DNA sequence with uncertain effects on disease
Likely benign	Likely benign change in the DNA sequence
Benign	Benign change in the DNA sequence

ACMG: American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; AMP: Association for Molecular Pathology.

Genetic Counseling

Experts recommend formal genetic counseling for patients who are at risk for inherited disorders and who wish to undergo genetic testing. Interpreting the results of genetic tests and understanding risk factors can be difficult for some patients; genetic counseling helps individuals understand the impact of genetic testing, including the possible effects the test results could have on the individual or their family members. It should be noted that genetic counseling may alter the utilization of genetic testing substantially and may reduce inappropriate testing; further, genetic counseling should be performed by an individual with experience and expertise in genetic medicine and genetic testing methods.

Medicare Coverage:
There is no National Coverage Determination (NCD) or Local Coverage Determination (LCD) for jurisdiction JL for this service. Therefore, Medicare Advantage Products will follow the Horizon BCBSNJ Medical Policy.


[RATIONALE: This policy was created in 2013 and has been updated regularly with searches of the PubMed database. The most recent literature update was performed through March 9, 2020.

Evidence reviews assess whether a medical test is clinically useful. A useful test provides information to make a clinical management decision that improves the net health outcome. That is, the balance of benefits and harms is better when the test is used to manage the condition than when another test or no test is used to manage the condition.

The first step in assessing a medical test is to formulate the clinical context and purpose of the test. The test must be technically reliable, clinically valid, and clinically useful for that purpose. Evidence reviews assess the evidence on whether a test is clinically valid and clinically useful. Technical reliability is outside the scope of these reviews, and credible information on technical reliability is available from other

Suspected Lactase Insufficiency
Clinical Context and Test Purpose

The purpose of targeted testing for the MCM6 -13910C>T variant in adults who have suspected lactase insufficiency is to inform a decision whether to undergo the hydrogen breath test (HBT), lactose tolerance blood test (LTT), or biopsy.

The question addressed in this policy is: Does testing for the MCM6 -13910C>T variant in adults who have suspected lactase insufficiency improve their net health outcome?

The following PICO was used to select literature to inform this policy.

Patients

The relevant population of interest is individuals with suspected lactase insufficiency.

Interventions

The test being considered is targeted testing for the MCM6 -13910C>T variant.

Patients with suspected lactase insufficiency are managed in primary care and may be referred to gastroenterology.

Comparators

The following practice is currently being used: empirical diagnosis by dietary restrictions.

Patients with suspected lactase insufficiency are managed in primary care and may be referred to gastroenterology.

Outcomes

The potential beneficial outcomes of primary interest include establishing a molecular genetic diagnosis of lactase insufficiency to inform management decisions based on test results.

The time frame for outcome measures varies from several weeks to months for the improvement of symptoms to long-term alleviation of symptoms.

Study Selection Criteria

Below are selection criteria for studies to assess whether a test is clinically valid.

• The study population represents the population of interest. Eligibility and selection are described.
• The test is compared with a credible reference standard.
• If the test is intended to replace or be an adjunct to an existing test; it should also be compared with that test.
• Studies should report sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Studies that completely report true- and false-positive results are ideal. Studies reporting other measures (eg, ROC, AUROC, c-statistic, likelihood ratios) may be included but are less informative.
• Studies should also report reclassification of diagnostic or risk category.

Assessment of technical reliability focuses on specific tests and operators and requires review of unpublished and often proprietary information. Review of specific tests, operators, and unpublished data are outside the scope of this policy, and alternative sources exist. This policy focuses on the clinical validity and clinical utility.

Clinically Valid

A test must detect the presence or absence of a condition, the risk of developing a condition in the future, or treatment response (beneficial or adverse).

Review of Evidence

Many studies have evaluated the diagnosis of lactase insufficiency using polymerase chain reaction variant analysis of MCM6 -13910C>T, and those that have assessed the agreement between genotyping and HBT, LTT, or biopsy are presented in Table 3. Nineteen studies have compared genotyping of the single nucleotide variant (SNV) -13910C>T with HBT and found sensitivities and specificities ranging from 71% to 100% and 64% to 100%, respectively. Five studies compared genotyping with LTT and reported sensitivities and specificities ranging from 85% to 100% and 87% to 95%, respectively. Enko et al (2014) compared genotyping with a hydrogen/methane breath test, which may be more sensitive than HBT, and reported moderate agreement (Cohen’s k=0.44).^12, Heterogeneity in study populations, a dose of lactose given during the HBT and LTT, and age of participants contributed to the wide range of observed sensitivities and specificities. Direct comparison of these tests is not possible because no identified studies compared both genotyping and HBT or LTT with the criterion standard of duodenal mucosal biopsy. The indirect comparison is also not possible because of the small number of studies comparing genotyping, HBT, or LTT with biopsy.

The incomplete agreement is expected between genotyping for lactase insufficiency and indirect tests of lactose malabsorption because these tests do not measure the same parameters. LTT and HBT are intended to diagnose lactose malabsorption, which can be caused by factors other than lactase insufficiency. Additionally, because lactase activity persists for years after weaning, the inclusion of children can affect the concordance between HBT or LTT and genotyping. Di Stefano et al (2009) found that the overall k value for agreement between HBT and genotyping was 0.74, but for those younger than and older than 30 years of age, k values were 0.56 and 1.0, respectively (p<0.005 for both comparisons).^13,

The SNV -13910C>T is not the only MCM6 variant implicated in regulating transcription of the lactase (LCT) gene.Eadala et al (2011) recruited patients with inflammatory bowel disease along with healthy control patients and found that, although the C/C genotype was strongly associated with experiencing symptoms of lactose intolerance after HBT, there was a high proportion of lactose sensitivity in C/T and T/T genotype patients as well.^14,Mendoza Torres et al (2012) found low specificity (46%) when comparing HBT with genotyping.^15, The authors attributed this to the genetic heterogeneity of the Colombian and Caribbean population studied, and recommended against using genotyping to assess lactase insufficiency in this population.Santonocito et al (2015) found a similar proportion (»80%) of homozygous genotypes for lactase nonpersistence among 1426 patients with gastrointestinal symptoms and 1000 healthy volunteers in south-central Italy.^16, These results would suggest that unmeasured genetic variation may more fully explain lactase insufficiency.

Table 3. Reported Sensitivities and Specificities Between Genotyping and HBT, LTT, and Intestinal Biopsy^a

Study, Country	N	Sensitivity (95% CI), %	Specificity (95% CI), %
Targeted variant analysis of SNV -13910C>T vs. HBT
Gugatschka et al (2005), Austria17,	51	90 (73 to 98)	95 (76 to 100)
Buning et al (2005), Germany18,	166	98 (93 to 100)	83 (71 to 91)
Hogenauer et al (2005), Austria9,	123	97 (86 to 100)	86 (77 to 93)
Bulhoes et al (2007), Brazil19,	20	90 (55 to 100)	100 (69 to 100)
Schirru et al (2007), Italy20,	84	84 (72 to 93)	96 (81 to 100)
Bernardes-Silva et al (2007), Brazil21,	147	76 (59 to 89)	100 (40 to 100)
Szilagyi et al (2007), Canada22,	30	93 (68 to 100)	80 (52 to 96)
Kerber et al (2007), Austria23,	120	97 (86 to 100)	72 (61 to 95)
Mattar et al (2008), Brazil24,	50	96 (82 to 100)	100 (85 to 100)
Krawczyk et al (2008), Germany25,	58	100 (78 to 100)	95 (84 to 99)
Mottes et al (2008), Italy26,	112	71 (60 to 80)	83 (61 to 95)
Waud et al (2008), Wales27,	200	100 (88 to 100)	64 (57 to 71)
Di Stefano et al (2009), Italy13,	32	88 (70 to 98)	100 (54 to 100)
Nagy et al (2009), Hungary28,	186	77 (68 to 85)	94 (87 to 98)
Szilagyi et al (2009), Canada29,	57	97 (83 to 100)	93 (76 to 99)
Babu et al (2010), India30,	153	87 (80 to 93)	97 (85 to 100)
Pohl et al (2010), Germany31,	194	90 (80 to 96)	98 (94 to 100)
Mendoza Torres et al (2012), Columbia15,	126	97	46
Morales et al (2011), Chile32,	51	96.3	87.5
Targeted variant analysis of SNV -13910C>T vs. H/MBT
Enko et al (2014), Austria12,	263	79	87
Targeted variant analysis of SNV -13910C>T vs. LTT
Nilsson et al (2004), Sweden33,	35	100	88
Gugatschka et al (2005), Austria17,	46	85	90
Ridefelt et al (2005), Canada34,	51	90	95
Szilagyi et al (2007), Canada22,	30	93	87
Babu et al (2010), India30,	153	97	87
Targeted variant analysis of -13910C>T vs. biopsy-determined lactase activity
Rasinpera et al (2004), Finland35,	329 <5 y: 109 6-11 y: 142 ≥12 y: 78	NA 80 94.6 93.3	NA 65.4 81.9 100
Nilsson et al (2004), Sweden33,	35	100	88
Kuchay et al (2011), India36,	176b >5 y: 108b >8 y: NR	NA 96 97.2	NA 78.9 100
Mattar et al (2013), Brazil37,	32	100	48
Targeted variant analysis of -22018G>A vs. HBT
Bernardes-Silva et al (2007), Brazil21,	147	73	82
Kerber et al (2007), Austria23,	166	100	71
Di Stefano et al (2009), Italy13,	123	89	100

CI; confidence interval; HBT: hydrogen breath test; H/MBT: hydrogen methane breath test; LTT: lactose tolerance blood test; NA: not applicable; NR: not reported; SNV: single nucleotide variant.

^a There was heterogeneity in how the HBT and LTT were conducted (eg, using 25 g or 50 g of lactose) and in populations tested (eg, inclusion of children or racial/ethnic composition of study populations).
^b Children.

Section Summary: Clinically Valid

Evidence of clinical validity for variant analysis of -13910C>T includes genotype-phenotype correlation studies and a meta-analysis. Discordance between genotyping for lactase insufficiency and indirect tests of lactose malabsorption such as LTT and HBT have been noted given that lactose malabsorption can be caused by factors other than lactase insufficiency. Studies have demonstrated that analysis of the -13910C>T variant can detect lactase insufficiency.

Clinically Useful

A test is clinically useful if the use of the results informs management decisions that improve the net health outcome of care. The net health outcome can be improved if patients receive correct therapy, or more effective therapy, or avoid unnecessary therapy, or avoid unnecessary testing.

Direct Evidence

Direct evidence of clinical utility is provided by studies that have compared health outcomes for patients managed with and without the test. Because these are intervention studies, the preferred evidence would be from randomized controlled trials.

No studies were identified that attempted to demonstrate improved patient outcomes or changes in patient management because of genetic testing for lactase insufficiency.

Chain of Evidence

Indirect evidence on clinical utility rests on clinical validity. If the evidence is insufficient to demonstrate test performance, no inferences can be made about clinical utility.

Lactase insufficiency is the normal phenotype for most adults, and a confirmatory diagnosis with HBT, LTT, or genotyping is unnecessary. Empirical diagnosis by dietary restriction is adequate in most circumstances because this is the primary treatment for lactase insufficient patients. Patients who achieve satisfactory symptom control after dietary modification require no further diagnostic testing. For most patients who do not achieve symptom control after dietary modification, testing is indicated for the presence of other conditions that can cause similar symptoms.

The proposed clinical utility of genotyping for lactase insufficiency is that the test offers a more comfortable assessment for patients when compared with HBT, LTT, or biopsy. Traditional testing methods may be associated with discomfort caused by the ingestion of a large volume of lactose, and there are dietary preparations and fasting before testing. Additionally, factors that may cause false-positive HBT, and LTT results will not cause false-positive genotype results. Arroyo et al (2010) suggested that genetic testing, when used with HBT, can help in the diagnosis of secondary hypolactasia when there is a positive HBT and the patient is not -13910C/C genotype.^39,

Section Summary: Clinically Useful

Direct evidence for the clinical utility of genotyping for lactase insufficiency is lacking. Genetic testing has the potential advantage of sparing patients the discomfort of fasting and experiencing symptoms of lactose intolerance during the administration of HBT, LTT, or biopsy. However, meaningful improvements in health outcomes through the use of genotyping for lactase insufficiency have not been demonstrated.

Summary of Evidence

For individuals with suspected lactase insufficiency who receive targeted testing for the MCM6 -13910C>T variant, the evidence includes genotype-phenotype studies and a meta-analysis. Relevant outcomes are symptoms, morbid events, functional outcomes, health status measures, and quality of life. Studies have demonstrated a high correlation between the -13910C>T single nucleotide variant upstream of the gene encoding the enzyme lactase, and lactase insufficiency in persons of European ancestry. Studies in white populations have reported a high degree of agreement for the diagnosis of lactase insufficiency between genotyping and both hydrogen breath test and lactose tolerance blood test. However, there is no current treatment for lactase insufficiency, and management involves dietary restriction and palliation of lactose intolerance symptoms. Therefore, an empirical diagnosis of lactose intolerance in the absence of confirmation by hydrogen breath test, lactose tolerance blood test, or genotyping, followed by treatment with dietary restriction of lactose, is suitable. Currently, the evidence does not support the conclusion that assessment of the genetic etiology of lactose intolerance would affect patient management or improve clinical outcomes. The evidence is insufficient to determine the effects of the technology on health outcomes.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Practice Guidelines and Position Statements

No guidelines or statements were identified.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations

Not applicable.

Ongoing and Unpublished Clinical Trials

A search of ClinicalTrials.gov in March 2020 did not identify any ongoing or unpublished trials that would likely influence this review.]
________________________________________________________________________________________

Horizon BCBSNJ Medical Policy Development Process:

This Horizon BCBSNJ Medical Policy (the “Medical Policy”) has been developed by Horizon BCBSNJ’s Medical Policy Committee (the “Committee”) consistent with generally accepted standards of medical practice, and reflects Horizon BCBSNJ’s view of the subject health care services, supplies or procedures, and in what circumstances they are deemed to be medically necessary or experimental/ investigational in nature. This Medical Policy also considers whether and to what degree the subject health care services, supplies or procedures are clinically appropriate, in terms of type, frequency, extent, site and duration and if they are considered effective for the illnesses, injuries or diseases discussed. Where relevant, this Medical Policy considers whether the subject health care services, supplies or procedures are being requested primarily for the convenience of the covered person or the health care provider. It may also consider whether the services, supplies or procedures are more costly than an alternative service or sequence of services, supplies or procedures that are at least as likely to produce equivalent therapeutic or diagnostic results as to the diagnosis or treatment of the relevant illness, injury or disease. In reaching its conclusion regarding what it considers to be the generally accepted standards of medical practice, the Committee reviews and considers the following: all credible scientific evidence published in peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, physician and health care provider specialty society recommendations, the views of physicians and health care providers practicing in relevant clinical areas (including, but not limited to, the prevailing opinion within the appropriate specialty) and any other relevant factor as determined by applicable State and Federal laws and regulations.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Index:
Genetic Testing for Lactase Insufficiency
LactoTYPE
LactoType
MCM6-13910C>T Variant Analysis
MCM6 Sequencing

References:
1. Suchy FJ, Brannon PM, Carpenter TO, et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference: lactose intolerance and health. Ann Intern Med. Jun 15 2010; 152(12): 792-6. PMID 20404261

2. Matthews SB, Waud JP, Roberts AG, et al. Systemic lactose intolerance: a new perspective on an old problem. Postgrad Med J. Mar 2005; 81(953): 167-73. PMID 15749792

3. Shaukat A, Levitt MD, Taylor BC, et al. Systematic review: effective management strategies for lactose intolerance. Ann Intern Med. Jun 15 2010; 152(12): 797-803. PMID 20404262

4. Sahi T. Genetics and epidemiology of adult-type hypolactasia. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1994; 202: 7-20. PMID 8042019

5. Wilt TJ, Shaukat A, Shamliyan T, et al. Lactose intolerance and health. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). Feb 2010; (192): 1-410. PMID 20629478

6. Misselwitz B, Pohl D, Fruhauf H, et al. Lactose malabsorption and intolerance: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. United European Gastroenterol J. Jun 2013; 1(3): 151-9. PMID 24917953

7. Jellema P, Schellevis FG, van der Windt DA, et al. Lactose malabsorption and intolerance: a systematic review on the diagnostic value of gastrointestinal symptoms and self-reported milk intolerance. QJM. Aug 2010; 103(8): 555-72. PMID 20522486

8. Haberkorn BC, Ermens AA, Koeken A, et al. Improving diagnosis of adult-type hypolactasia in patients with abdominal complaints. Clin Chem Lab Med. Sep 21 2011; 50(1): 119-23. PMID 21936609

9. Hogenauer C, Hammer HF, Mellitzer K, et al. Evaluation of a new DNA test compared with the lactose hydrogen breath test for the diagnosis of lactase non-persistence. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Mar 2005; 17(3): 371-6. PMID 15716664

10. Enattah NS, Sahi T, Savilahti E, et al. Identification of a variant associated with adult-type hypolactasia. Nat Genet. Feb 2002; 30(2): 233-7. PMID 11788828

11. Raz M, Sharon Y, Yerushalmi B, et al. Frequency of LCT-13910C/T and LCT-22018G/A single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with adult-type hypolactasia/lactase persistence among Israelis of different ethnic groups. Gene. Apr 25 2013; 519(1): 67-70. PMID 23415628

12. Enko D, Rezanka E, Stolba R, et al. Lactose malabsorption testing in daily clinical practice: a critical retrospective analysis and comparison of the hydrogen/methane breath test and genetic test (c/t-13910 polymorphism) results. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014; 2014: 464382. PMID 24829570

13. Di Stefano M, Terulla V, Tana P, et al. Genetic test for lactase non-persistence and hydrogen breath test: is genotype better than phenotype to diagnose lactose malabsorption?. Dig Liver Dis. Jul 2009; 41(7): 474-9. PMID 19010095

14. Eadala P, Matthews SB, Waud JP, et al. Association of lactose sensitivity with inflammatory bowel disease--demonstrated by analysis of genetic polymorphism, breath gases and symptoms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. Oct 2011; 34(7): 735-46. PMID 21815901

15. Mendoza Torres E, Varela Prieto LL, Villarreal Camacho JL, et al. Diagnosis of adult-type hypolactasia/lactase persistence: genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP C/T-13910) is not consistent with breath test in Colombian Caribbean population. Arq Gastroenterol. Jan-Mar 2012; 49(1): 5-8. PMID 22481679

16. Santonocito C, Scapaticci M, Guarino D, et al. Lactose intolerance genetic testing: is it useful as routine screening? Results on 1426 south-central Italy patients. Clin Chim Acta. Jan 15 2015; 439: 14-7. PMID 25281930

17. Gugatschka M, Dobnig H, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, et al. Molecularly-defined lactose malabsorption, milk consumption and anthropometric differences in adult males. QJM. Dec 2005; 98(12): 857-63. PMID 16299058

18. Buning C, Genschel J, Jurga J, et al. Introducing genetic testing for adult-type hypolactasia. Digestion. 2005; 71(4): 245-50. PMID 16024930

19. Bulhoes AC, Goldani HA, Oliveira FS, et al. Correlation between lactose absorption and the C/T-13910 and G/A-22018 mutations of the lactase-phlorizin hydrolase (LCT) gene in adult-type hypolactasia. Braz J Med Biol Res. Nov 2007; 40(11): 1441-6. PMID 17934640

20. Schirru E, Corona V, Usai-Satta P, et al. Genetic testing improves the diagnosis of adult type hypolactasia in the Mediterranean population of Sardinia. Eur J Clin Nutr. Oct 2007; 61(10): 1220-5. PMID 17311063

21. Bernardes-Silva CF, Pereira AC, de Fatima Alves da Mota G, et al. Lactase persistence/non-persistence variants, C/T_13910 and G/A_22018, as a diagnostic tool for lactose intolerance in IBS patients. Clin Chim Acta. Nov-Dec 2007; 386(1-2): 7-11. PMID 17706627

22. Szilagyi A, Malolepszy P, Hamard E, et al. Comparison of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for lactase genetic polymorphism with standard indirect tests for lactose maldigestion. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. Feb 2007; 5(2): 192-6. PMID 16876487

23. Kerber M, Oberkanins C, Kriegshauser G, et al. Hydrogen breath testing versus LCT genotyping for the diagnosis of lactose intolerance: a matter of age?. Clin Chim Acta. Aug 2007; 383(1-2): 91-6. PMID 17574225

24. Mattar R, Monteiro Mdo S, Villares CA, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism C/T(-13910), located upstream of the lactase gene, associated with adult-type hypolactasia: validation for clinical practice. Clin Biochem. May 2008; 41(7-8): 628-30. PMID 18237552

25. Krawczyk M, Wolska M, Schwartz S, et al. Concordance of genetic and breath tests for lactose intolerance in a tertiary referral centre. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. Jun 2008; 17(2): 135-9. PMID 18568133

26. Mottes M, Belpinati F, Milani M, et al. Genetic testing for adult-type hypolactasia in Italian families. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008; 46(7): 980-4. PMID 18605960

27. Waud JP, Matthews SB, Campbell AK. Measurement of breath hydrogen and methane, together with lactase genotype, defines the current best practice for investigation of lactose sensitivity. Ann Clin Biochem. Jan 2008; 45(Pt 1): 50-8. PMID 18275674

28. Nagy D, Bogacsi-Szabo E, Varkonyi A, et al. Prevalence of adult-type hypolactasia as diagnosed with genetic and lactose hydrogen breath tests in Hungarians. Eur J Clin Nutr. Jul 2009; 63(7): 909-12. PMID 19156157

29. Szilagyi A, Shrier I, Chong G, et al. Lack of effect of lactose digestion status on baseline fecal micoflora. Can J Gastroenterol. Nov 2009; 23(11): 753-9. PMID 19893771

30. Babu J, Kumar S, Babu P, et al. Frequency of lactose malabsorption among healthy southern and northern Indian populations by genetic analysis and lactose hydrogen breath and tolerance tests. Am J Clin Nutr. Jan 2010; 91(1): 140-6. PMID 19889824

31. Pohl D, Savarino E, Hersberger M, et al. Excellent agreement between genetic and hydrogen breath tests for lactase deficiency and the role of extended symptom assessment. Br J Nutr. Sep 2010; 104(6): 900-7. PMID 20398434

32. Morales E, Azocar L, Maul X, et al. The European lactase persistence genotype determines the lactase persistence state and correlates with gastrointestinal symptoms in the Hispanic and Amerindian Chilean population: a case-control and population-based study. BMJ Open. Jul 29 2011; 1(1): e000125. PMID 22021768

33. Nilsson TK, Johansson CA. A novel method for diagnosis of adult hypolactasia by genotyping of the -13910 C/T polymorphism with Pyrosequencing technology. Scand J Gastroenterol. Mar 2004; 39(3): 287-90. PMID 15074401

34. Ridefelt P, Hakansson LD. Lactose intolerance: lactose tolerance test versus genotyping. Scand J Gastroenterol. Jul 2005; 40(7): 822-6. PMID 16109658

35. Rasinpera H, Savilahti E, Enattah NS, et al. A genetic test which can be used to diagnose adult-type hypolactasia in children. Gut. Nov 2004; 53(11): 1571-6. PMID 15479673

36. Kuchay RA, Thapa BR, Mahmood A, et al. Effect of C/T -13910 cis-acting regulatory variant on expression and activity of lactase in Indian children and its implication for early genetic screening of adult-type hypolactasia. Clin Chim Acta. Oct 09 2011; 412(21-22): 1924-30. PMID 21763294

37. Mattar R, Basile-Filho A, Kemp R, et al. Comparison of Quick Lactose Intolerance Test in duodenal biopsies of dyspeptic patients with single nucleotide polymorphism LCT-13910C T associated with primary hypolactasia/lactase-persistence. Acta Cir Bras. 2013; 28 Suppl 1: 77-82. PMID 23381829

38. Marton A, Xue X, Szilagyi A. Meta-analysis: the diagnostic accuracy of lactose breath hydrogen or lactose tolerance tests for predicting the North European lactase polymorphism C/T-13910. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. Feb 2012; 35(4): 429-40. PMID 22211845

39. Arroyo MA, Lopes A, Piatto V, et al. Perspectives for early genetic screening of lactose intolerance: - 13910C/T polymorphism tracking in the MCM6 gene. Open Biol J. 2010;3:66-71. https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOBIOJ/TOBIOJ-3-66.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2020.

81400