E-Mail Us Close
Please note that this email should only be used for feedback and comments specifically related to this particular medical policy.
  
Horizon BCBSNJ
Uniform Medical Policy ManualSection:Medicine
Policy Number:087
Effective Date: 02/15/2016
Original Policy Date:09/22/2015
Last Review Date:08/13/2019
Date Published to Web: 11/12/2015
Subject:
Polysomnography for Non‒Respiratory Sleep Disorders

Description:
_______________________________________________________________________________________

IMPORTANT NOTE:

The purpose of this policy is to provide general information applicable to the administration of health benefits that Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey and Horizon Healthcare of New Jersey, Inc. (collectively “Horizon BCBSNJ”) insures or administers. If the member’s contract benefits differ from the medical policy, the contract prevails. Although a service, supply or procedure may be medically necessary, it may be subject to limitations and/or exclusions under a member’s benefit plan. If a service, supply or procedure is not covered and the member proceeds to obtain the service, supply or procedure, the member may be responsible for the cost. Decisions regarding treatment and treatment plans are the responsibility of the physician. This policy is not intended to direct the course of clinical care a physician provides to a member, and it does not replace a physician’s independent professional clinical judgment or duty to exercise special knowledge and skill in the treatment of Horizon BCBSNJ members. Horizon BCBSNJ is not responsible for, does not provide, and does not hold itself out as a provider of medical care. The physician remains responsible for the quality and type of health care services provided to a Horizon BCBSNJ member.

Horizon BCBSNJ medical policies do not constitute medical advice, authorization, certification, approval, explanation of benefits, offer of coverage, contract or guarantee of payment.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Polysomnography (PSG) records multiple physiologic parameters relevant to sleep. Videorecording may also be performed during PSG to assess parasomnias such as rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder.

Populations
Interventions
Comparators
Outcomes
Individuals:
  • With suspected hypersomnia
Interventions of interest are:
  • Polysomnography
Comparators of interest are:
  • Clinical diagnosis alone
Relevant outcomes include:
  • Test accuracy
  • Symptoms
  • Functional outcomes
  • Quality of life
Individuals:
  • With typical or benign parasomnia
Interventions of interest are:
  • Polysomnography
Comparators of interest are:
  • Clinical diagnosis alone
Relevant outcomes include:
  • Test accuracy
  • Symptoms
  • Functional outcomes
  • Quality of life
Individuals:
  • With violent or potentially injurious parasomnia
Interventions of interest are:
  • Polysomnography
Comparators of interest are:
  • Clinical diagnosis alone
Relevant outcomes include:
  • Test accuracy
  • Symptoms
  • Functional outcomes
  • Quality of life
Individuals:
  • With restless legs syndrome
Interventions of interest are:
  • Polysomnography
Comparators of interest are:
  • Clinical diagnosis alone
Relevant outcomes include:
  • Test accuracy
  • Symptoms
  • Functional outcomes
  • Quality of life
Individuals:
  • With periodic limb movement disorder
Interventions of interest are:
  • Polysomnography
Comparators of interest are:
  • Clinical diagnosis alone
Relevant outcomes include:
  • Test accuracy
  • Symptoms
  • Functional outcomes
  • Quality of life

Background

Hypersomnias

The hypersomnias include such disorders as narcolepsy, Klein-Levine syndrome, and idiopathic hypersomnolence. Narcolepsy is a neurologic disorder characterized predominantly by abnormalities of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, some abnormalities of non-REM (NREM) sleep, and the presence of excessive daytime sleepiness that cannot be fully relieved by any amount of sleep. The classic symptoms include hypersomnolence, cataplexy, sleep paralysis, and hypnagogic (onset of sleep) hallucinations. Cataplexy refers to the total or partial loss of muscle tone in response to sudden emotion. Most patients with cataplexy have abnormally low levels of hypocretin-1 (orexin-A) in the cerebrospinal fluid.1,Narcolepsy type 1 (narcolepsy with cataplexy) is defined as excessive daytime sleepiness and at least one of the following criteria: (a) hypocretin deficiency or (b) cataplexy and a positive multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). In the MSLT, the patient lies down in a dark, quiet room to assess the time to enter the different stages of sleep. The test is repeated every 2 hours throughout the day, and the maximum time allowed to fall sleep is typically set at 20 minutes. Patients with narcolepsy often have a mean sleep latency of fewer than five minutes and two or more early-onset REM periods during the MSLT naps. People with idiopathic hypersomnia fall asleep easily but typically do not reach REM sleep during the MSLT. Narcolepsy type 2 (narcolepsy without cataplexy) is defined by chronic sleepiness plus a positive MSLT; hypocretin-1 levels are in the normal range in most patients.

Parasomnias

Parasomnias are abnormal behavioral, experiential, or physiologic events that occur during entry into sleep, within sleep, or during arousals from sleep. Parasomnias can result in a serious disruption of sleep-wake schedules and family functioning. Some, particularly sleepwalking, sleep terrors, and REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), can cause injury to the patient and others. Parasomnias are classified into parasomnias associated with REM sleep, parasomnias associated with NREM sleep, and other parasomnias.

Parasomnias Associated With REM Sleep

REM sleep is normally accompanied by muscle atonia, in which there is almost complete paralysis of the body through inhibition of motor neurons. In patients with RBD, muscle tone is maintained during REM sleep. This can lead to abnormal or disruptive behaviors associated with vivid dreams such as talking, laughing, shouting, gesturing, grabbing, flailing arms, punching, kicking, sitting up or leaping from bed, and running.2, Violent episodes that carry a risk of harm to the patient or bed partner may occur up to several times nightly. Idiopathic RBD is associated with the development of degenerative synucleinopathies (Parkinson disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, multiple systems atrophy) in about half of patients. Guidelines recommend maintaining a safe sleeping environment for both the patient and bed partner along with medical therapy. Other parasomnias associated with REM sleep are recurrent isolated sleep paralysis and nightmare disorder.

Parasomnias Associated With NREM Sleep

Disorders of arousal from NREM sleep result from the intrusion of wake into NREM sleep. These include confusional arousals, sleepwalking, and sleep terrors. In these parasomnias, the patient has an incomplete awakening from NREM sleep, usually appears awake with eyes open, is unresponsive to external stimuli, and is amnestic to the event. Sleepwalking can range from calm behaviors such as walking through a house to violent and/or injurious behaviors such as jumping out of a second story window. Patients with sleep terrors (also called night terrors) typically awaken with a loud scream and feeling of intense fear, jump out of bed, and occasionally may commit a violent act.

Other Parasomnias

The category of "other parasomnias" has no specific relation to sleep stage and includes sleep-related dissociative disorders, sleep-related enuresis, sleep-related groaning, exploding head syndrome, sleep-related hallucinations, and a sleep-related eating disorder. Diagnosis of these disorders is primarily clinical, although polysomnography (PSG) may be used for differential diagnosis.


    •In sleep-related dissociative disorders, behaviors occur during an awakening but the patient is amnestic to them.

    •Sleep-related enuresis (bedwetting) is characterized by recurrent involuntary voiding in patients greater than five years of age.

    •Sleep-related groaning is a prolonged vocalization that can occur during either NREM or REM sleep.

    •Exploding head syndrome is a sensation of a sudden loud noise or explosive feeling within the head on falling asleep or during awakening from sleep.

    •Sleep-related hallucinations are hallucinations that occur on falling asleep or on awakening.

    •Sleep-related eating disorder is characterized by recurrent episodes of arousals from sleep with involuntary eating or drinking. Patients may have several episodes during the night, typically eat foods that they would not eat during the day and may injure themselves by cooking during sleep.


Sleep-Related Movement Disorders

Sleep-related movement disorders include restless legs syndrome (RLS) and periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD).

Restless Legs Syndrome

RLS is a neurologic disorder characterized by uncomfortable or odd sensations in the leg that usually occur during periods of relaxation, such as while watching television, reading, or attempting to fall asleep. Symptoms occur primarily in the evening. The sensations are typically described as creeping, crawling, itchy, burning, or tingling. There is an urge to move in an effort to relieve these feelings, which may be partially relieved by activities such as rubbing or slapping the le.g., bouncing the feet, or walking around the room.

Periodic Limb Movement Disorder

Periodic limb movements are involuntary, stereotypic, repetitive limb movements during sleep, which most often occur in the lower extremities, including the toes, ankles, knees, and hips, and occasionally in the upper extremities. The repetitive movements can cause fragmented sleep architecture, with frequent awakenings, a reduction in slow-wave sleep and decreased sleep efficiency, leading to excessive daytime sleepiness. PLMD alone is thought to be rare because periodic limb movements are typically associated with RLS, RBD, or narcolepsy and represent a distinct diagnosis from PLMD.3,

Diagnosis

PSG is a recording of multiple physiologic parameters relevant to sleep. The standard full polysomnogram includes:


    •Electroencephalography to differentiate the various stages of sleep and wake,

    •Chin electromyography and electrooculography to assess muscle tone and detect REM sleep,

    •Respiratory effort, airflow, blood oxygen saturation (oximetry), and electrocardiography to assess apneic events,

    •Anterior tibialis electromyogram to assess periodic limb movements during sleep, and

    •Video recording to detect any unusual behavior.


This policy addresses PSG for non-respiratory sleep disorders, which include the hypersomnias (e.g., narcolepsy), parasomnias, and movement disorders (e.g., RLS, PLMD).

Regulatory Status

A large number of PSG devices have been approved since 1986. U.S. Food and Drug Administration product code: OLV.

Related Policies

  • Diagnosis and Medical Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (Policy #002 in the Medicine Section)

Policy:
(NOTE: For Medicare Advantage, please refer to the Medicare Coverage Section below for coverage guidance.)

I. Polysomnography (PSG) and a multiple sleep latency test performed on the day after the PSG is considered medically necessary in the evaluation of suspected narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia.

II. PSG is considered medically necessary when evaluating members with parasomnias when there is a history of sleep-related injurious or potentially injurious disruptive behaviors.

III. PSG is considered medically necessary when a diagnosis of periodic limb movement disorder is considered when there is:

  • A complaint of repetitive limb movement during sleep by the member or an observer; AND
  • No other concurrent sleep disorder; AND
  • At least one of the following is present:
  • Frequent awakenings; OR
  • Fragmented sleep; OR
  • Difficulty maintaining sleep; OR
  • Excessive daytime sleepiness

IV. PSG for the diagnosis of periodic limb movement disorder is not considered medically necessary when there is concurrent untreated obstructive sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome, narcolepsy, or rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder.

V. PSG is considered investigational for the diagnosis of non‒respiratory sleep disorders not meeting the criteria above, including but not limited to nightmare disorder, depression, sleep-related bruxism, or noninjurious disorders of arousal.

Medicare Coverage:
There is no National Coverage Determination (NCD) for this service. In the absence of an NCD, coverage decisions are left to the discretion of Local Medicare Carriers. Novitas Solutions, Inc, the Local Medicare Carrier for jurisdiction JL, has determined that this service is covered when LCD L35050 criteria are met. Please refer to Local Coverage Determination (LCD): Outpatient Sleep Studies (L35050) for eligibility and coverage.

Local Coverage Determination (LCD): Outpatient Sleep Studies (L35050). Available to be accessed at Novitas Solutions, Inc., Medical Policy Search page: https://www.novitas-solutions.com/webcenter/portal/MedicareJL/LcdSearch?_afrLoop=90769712476969#!%40%40%3F_afrLoop%3D90769712476969%26centerWidth%3D100%2525%26leftWidth%3D0%2525%26rightWidth%3D0%2525%26showFooter%3Dfalse%26showHeader%3Dfalse%26_adf.ctrl-state%3D63y7eftob_46

Local Coverage Article: Billing and Coding: Outpatient Sleep Studies (A56923). Available to be accessed at Novitas Solutions, Inc., Medical Policy Search page: https://www.novitas-solutions.com/webcenter/portal/MedicareJL/LcdSearch?_afrLoop=90769712476969#!%40%40%3F_afrLoop%3D90769712476969%26centerWidth%3D100%2525%26leftWidth%3D0%2525%26rightWidth%3D0%2525%26showFooter%3Dfalse%26showHeader%3Dfalse%26_adf.ctrl-state%3D63y7eftob_46.


[RATIONALE: This policy was created in 2015 and has been updated regularly with searches of the MEDLINE database. The most recent literature update was performed through April 1, 2019.

This policy was informed by evidence examined by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM).1,2,4,5,

Evidence reviews assess whether a medical test is clinically useful. A useful test provides information to make a clinical management decision that improves the net health outcome. That is, the balance of benefits and harms is better when the test is used to manage the condition than when another test or no test is used to manage the condition.

The first step in assessing a medical test is to formulate the clinical context and purpose of the test. The test must be technically reliable, clinically valid, and clinically useful for that purpose. Evidence reviews assess the evidence on whether a test is clinically valid and clinically useful. Technical reliability is outside the scope of these reviews, and credible information on technical reliability is available from other sources.

HYPERSOMNIAS, PARASOMNIAS, AND SLEEP-RELATED MOVEMENT

Hypersomnia

Clinical Context and Therapy Purpose

The purpose of polysomnography (PSG) is to provide a diagnostic option that is an alternative to or an improvement on existing tests in patients with suspected hypersomnia.

The question addressed in this policy: Does the use of PSG to evaluate individuals with hypersomnias improve the net health outcome?

Patients

The relevant population of interest are individuals with suspected hypersomnia.

Interventions

The test being considered is PSG. PSG records multiple physiologic parameters relevant to sleep. Video recording may also be performed during PSG to assess parasomnias such as rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Patients with suspected hypersomnia are managed by neurologists, sleep disorder specialists, and primary care providers in an outpatient clinical setting.

Comparators

Comparators of interest include clinical diagnosis alone.

Outcomes

The general outcomes of interest are test accuracy, symptoms, functional outcomes, and quality of life (QOL). The classic symptoms include hypersomnolence, cataplexy, sleep paralysis, and hypnagogic (onset of sleep) hallucinations as well as related findings on PSG.

Study Selection Criteria

Below are selection criteria for studies to assess whether a test is clinically valid.


    a)The study population represents the population of interest. Eligibility and selection are described.

    b)The test is compared with a credible reference standard.

    c)If the test is intended to replace or be an adjunct to an existing test; it should also be compared with that test.

    d)Studies should report sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Studies that completely report true- and false-positive results are ideal. Studies reporting other measures (e.g., receiver operating characteristic , area under receiver operating characteristic , c-statistic, likelihood ratios) may be included but are less informative.

    e)Studies should also report reclassification of diagnostic or risk category.


Technically Reliable

Assessment of technical reliability focuses on specific tests and operators and requires a review of unpublished and often proprietary information. Review of specific tests, operators, and unpublished data are outside the scope of this policy and alternative sources exist. This policy focuses on the clinical validity and clinical utility.

Clinically Valid

A test must detect the presence or absence of a condition, the risk of developing a condition in the future, or treatment response (beneficial or adverse).

Evidence reviewed by Chesson et al (1997) for AASM included data on 1602 patients, of whom 176 patients had narcolepsy, and 1426 had other sleep disorders.5, However, 7% of obstructive sleep apnea patients and 5% of other sleep disorders patients had two sleep-onset REMs on a multiple sleep latency test (MSLT), leading to a low predictive value for narcolepsy. No data were found that validated the maintenance of wakefulness test (which measures a patient's ability to stay awake in a quiet sleep-inducing environment), limited or partial PSG, portable recording, isolated MSLT, or separately performed PSG and MSLT as an alternative to the criterion standard of nocturnal PSG with an MSLT on the day following the diagnosis of narcolepsy. An evidence review by Kushida et al (2005), also for AASM, found that the presence of 2 or more early sleep-onset latency episodes was associated with a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 93% for the diagnosis of narcolepsy.1,

Clinically Useful

A test is clinically useful if the use of the results informs management decisions that improve the net health outcome of care. The net health outcome can be improved if patients receive correct therapy, or more effective therapy, or avoid unnecessary therapy, or avoid unnecessary testing.

Based on the evidence reviewed, the updated AASM (2005) guidelines indicated that PSG should be used to rule out other potential causes of sleepiness followed by an MSLT to confirm the clinical impression of narcolepsy. These tests assume greater significance if cataplexy is lacking. In the absence of cataplexy and when there are one or more of the other symptoms, the laboratory criteria are required to establish the diagnosis of narcolepsy.

Section Summary: Hypersomnia

Evidence from a systematic review has indicated that, in patients suspected of having hypersomnia, nocturnal PSG should be used to rule out other sleep disorders that may cause daytime sleepiness. After excluding other sleep disorders with nocturnal PSG or a portable sleep study, short sleep latency in an MSLT has high specificity for the diagnosis of hypersomnia.

Parasomnias

Clinical Context and Test Purpose

The purpose of PSG is to provide a diagnostic option that is an alternative to or an improvement on existing tests in patients with typical or benign parasomnia.

The question addressed in this policy: Does the use of PSG to evaluate individuals with typical or benign parasomnias improve the net health outcome? The following PICOTS were used to select literature to inform this policy.

Patients

The population of interest are individuals with typical or benign parasomnias.

Interventions

The test being considered is PSG. PSG records multiple physiologic parameters relevant to sleep. Video recording may also be performed during PSG to assess parasomnias such as RBD. Patients with typical or benign parasomnia are managed by neurologists, sleep disorder specialists, and primary care providers in an outpatient clinical setting.

Comparators

Comparators of interest include clinical diagnosis alone.

Outcomes

The general outcomes of interest are test accuracy, symptoms, functional outcomes, and QOLas well as related findings on PSG.

Evidence reviewed by Chesson et al (1997) for AASM indicated that typical sleepwalking or sleep terrors, with onset in childhood, a positive family history, occurrence during the first third of the night, amnesia for the events, prompt return to sleep following the events, and relatively benign automatistic behaviors, may be diagnosed on the basis of their historical clinical features.5This conclusion was based on very consistent descriptive literature (case series and cohort studies).

Section Summary: Typical or Benign Parasomnia

The evidence on the diagnosis of typical or benign parasomnias includes a systematic review of case series and cohort studies. This evidence has shown that PSG does not provide additional diagnostic information beyond what can be obtained from historical clinical features.

Violent or Potentially Injurious Parasomnia

Clinical Context and Test Purpose

The purpose of PSG is to provide a diagnostic option that is an alternative to or an improvement on existing tests in patients with violent or potentially injurious parasomnia.

The question addressed in this policy: Does the use of PSG in patients with violent or potentially injurious parasomnia improve net health outcomes? The following PICOTS were used to select literature to inform this policy.

Patients

The population of interest are individuals with violent or potentially injurious parasomnia.

Interventions

The test being considered is PSG. PSG records multiple physiologic parameters relevant to sleep. Video recording may also be performed during PSG to assess parasomnias such as RBD. Patients with violent or potentially injurious parasomnia are managed by psychiatrists, neurologists, sleep disorder specialists, and primary care providers in an outpatient clinical setting.

Comparators

Comparators of interest include clinical diagnosis alone..

Outcomes

The general outcomes of interest are test accuracy, symptoms, functional outcomes, and QOL as well as related findings on PSG.

A test must detect the presence or absence of a condition, the risk of developing a condition in the future, or treatment response (beneficial or adverse).

Clinically Valid

When events are not typical of benign partial arousals and where other diagnoses, prognoses, and interventions should be considered, PSG was recommended by Chesson et al (1997) and supported by AASM. This evidence review included only three articles on disorders of arousal and two articles for RBD that included comparison data for normal controls.5, Most articles supporting the utility of PSG were limited by biases inherent in uncontrolled clinical reports. Evidence reviewed by Aurora et al (2010) for an AASM best practice guideline indicated that sleep-related injuries are a significant portion of the morbidity in RBD, with a prevalence in diagnosed RBD patients ranging from 30% to 81%.2, Types of injuries ranged from ecchymoses and lacerations to fractures and subdural hematomas, with ecchymoses and lacerations being significantly more common than fractures. In a series of 92 patients, 64% of the bed partners sustained punches, kicks, attempted strangulation, and assault with objects. Minimal diagnostic criteria for RBD requires the presence of REM sleep without atonia, defined as a sustained or intermittent elevation of submental electromyogram tone or excessive phasic muscle activity in the limb electromyogram.2, Two clinical series with over 100 patients each with various parasomnias found that PSG had an overall diagnostic yield in 65% and 91% of cases. In a systematic review assessing the diagnosis of RBD, Neikrug and Ancoli-Israel (2012) reported that diagnostic accuracy increases when combining the use of clinical history and video PSG to document the intermittent or sustained loss of muscle atonia or the actual observation of RBD occurrences.6,

Clinically Useful

A test is clinically useful if the use of the results informs management decisions that improve the net health outcome of care. The net health outcome can be improved if patients receive correct therapy, or more effective therapy, or avoid unnecessary therapy, or avoid unnecessary testing.

The need for PSG was also indicated in a review of parasomnias by Goldstein (2011), who concluded that, although RBD is the only parasomnia requiring PSG for diagnosis, PSG may be needed to rule out another sleep pathology, such as sleep-disordered breathing or PLMs of sleep, that might cause a parasomnia.7,

Section Summary: Violent or Potentially Injurious Parasomnia

The evidence on the use of PSG for diagnosing violent or potentially injurious parasomnia includes many case series and a systematic review of nonrandomized comparative studies. The large series showed a high diagnostic yield for video PSG in cases with a violent or potentially injurious parasomnia based on clinical history. Clinical utility is based on the importance of excluding other sleep disorders and appropriate interventions in patients who exhibit REM sleep without atonia.

Sleep-Related Movement Disorder

Restless Legs Syndrome

Clinical Context and Test Purpose

The purpose of PSG is to provide a diagnostic option that is an alternative to or an improvement on existing tests in patients with RLS.

The question addressed in this policy: Does the use of PSG to evaluate individuals with RLS improve net health outcomes?

The following PICOTS were used to select literature to inform this policy.

Patients

The population of interest are individuals with RLS.

Interventions

The test being considered is PSG. PSG records multiple physiologic parameters relevant to sleep. Video recording may also be performed during PSG to assess parasomnias such as RBD. Patients with RLS are managed by sleep disorder specialists, neurologists, and primary care providers in an outpatient clinical setting.

Comparators

Comparators of interest include clinical diagnosis alone.

Outcomes

The general outcomes of interest are test accuracy, symptoms, functional outcomes, and QOL as well as the results of the PSG.

Clinically Valid

A test must detect the presence or absence of a condition, the risk of developing a condition in the future, or treatment response (beneficial or adverse).

The four cardinal diagnostic features of RLS include (1) an urge to move the limbs (this is usually associated with paresthesias or dysesthesias), (2) symptoms that start or worsen with rest, (3) at least partial relief of symptoms with physical activity, and (4) worsening of symptoms in the evening or at night.3, Evidence reviewed by AASM included a case-control study that found RLS patients when compared with controls, had reduced total sleep time, reduced sleep efficiency, prolonged sleep latencies, decreased slow-wave sleep, and increased nocturnal awakening.

Clinically Useful

A test is clinically useful if the use of the results informs management decisions that improve the net health outcome of care. The net health outcome can be improved if patients receive correct therapy, or more effective therapy, or avoid unnecessary therapy, or avoid unnecessary testing.

Because the principal symptoms of RLS occur during wake, RLS does not require PSG for diagnosis, except where uncertainty exists in the diagnosis.1,5, RLS frequently also has a primary motor symptom that is characterized by the occurrence of periodic limb movements during sleep. Periodic limb movements occur in 80% to 90% of patients who have RLS and support the diagnosis of RLS.

Section Summary: RLS

A case-control study has shown that RLS impairs PSG measures of sleep; however, the principal symptoms of RLS occur during wake and, therefore, the disorder does not require PSG for diagnosis.

Periodic Limb Movement Disorder

Clinical Context and Test Purpose

The purpose of PSG is to provide a diagnostic option that is an alternative to or an improvement on existing tests in patients with PLMD.

The question addressed in this policy: Does the use of PSG to evaluate patients with PLMD improve net health outcomes?

The following PICOTS were used to select literature to inform this policy.

Patients

The population of interest are individuals with PLMD.

Interventions

The test being considered is PSG.

PSG records multiple physiologic parameters relevant to sleep. Video recording may also be performed during PSG to assess parasomnias such as RBD. Patients with PLMD are managed by neurologists and primary care providers in an outpatient clinical setting.

Comparators

Comparators of interest include clinical diagnosis alone.

Outcomes

The general outcomes of interest are test accuracy, symptoms, functional outcomes, and QOL as well as results of PSG.

PLMD can be diagnosed in the following cases: during PSG; during a subjective perception of poor sleep in the absence of RLS; or during a sleep-related breathing disorder.[3]

The evidence reviewed by Chesson et al (1997) for AASM suggested difficulty in diagnosing PLMD without PSG.5, In a series of 123 patients evaluated for chronic insomnia, a PLMD diagnosis was confirmed in 5 patients and discovered with PSG in another 10 patients. The PLMD scale from a sleep questionnaire had low sensitivity and specificity. Actigraphy, evoked potentials, and blink reflexes have been found to have little diagnostic specificity or utility. PSG-based diagnosis of PLMD correlated best with frequent awakening at night. In a series of 1171 patients who had PSG at 1 sleep disorders center, 67 (6%) patients had PLMD as the primary and sole sleep diagnosis. The mean sleep efficiency was 53%, and daytime sleepiness was reported by 60% of the cohort. The PLMD patients reported disturbed sleep during a mean of four nights per week for a mean of seven years.

Section Summary: PLMD

The evidence for the use of PSG for diagnosing PLMD includes a systematic review that concluded the diagnosis of PLMD is difficult without PSG. The review found low diagnostic accuracy of a sleep questionnaire or actigraphy, while a PSG-based diagnosis of PLMD correlated best with awakening at night.

Summary of Evidence

Hypersomnia

For individuals who have suspected hypersomnia who receive PSG, the evidence includes a systematic review on diagnostic accuracy. The relevant outcomes are test accuracy, symptoms, functional outcomes, and QOL. The evidence has suggested that PSG followed by the MSLT is associated with moderate sensitivity and high specificity in support of the diagnosis of narcolepsy. The evidence is sufficient to determine that the technology results in a meaningful improvement in the net health outcome.

Parasomnias

For individuals who have typical or benign parasomnia who receive PSG, the evidence includes systematic reviews of studies on diagnostic accuracy and controlled cohort studies. The relevant outcomes are test accuracy, symptoms, functional outcomes, and QOL. The evidence has suggested that typical and benign parasomnias (e.g., sleepwalking, sleep terrors) may be diagnosed on the basis of their clinical features and do not require PSG. The evidence is sufficient to determine that the technology is unlikely to improve the net health outcome.

For individuals who have violent or potentially injurious parasomnia who receive PSG, the evidence includes systematic reviews of studies on diagnostic accuracy and controlled cohort studies. The relevant outcomes are test accuracy, symptoms, functional outcomes, and QOL. For the diagnosis of RBD, the combined use of clinical history and PSG to document the loss of muscle atonia during REM sleep increases diagnostic accuracy and is considered the criterion standard for diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy is increased with video recording during PSG to assess parasomnias such as RBD. The evidence is sufficient to determine that the technology results in a meaningful improvement in the net health outcome.

Sleep-Related Movement Disorders

For individuals who have RLS who receive PSG, the evidence includes systematic reviews of studies on diagnostic accuracy and controlled cohort studies. The relevant outcomes are test accuracy, symptoms, functional outcomes, and QOL. RLS does not require PSG because the syndrome is a sensorimotor disorder, the symptoms of which occur predominantly when awake; therefore, PSG results are generally not useful. The evidence is sufficient to determine that the technology is unlikely to improve the net health outcome.

For individuals who have PLMD who receive PSG, the evidence includes a systematic review. The relevant outcomes are test accuracy, symptoms, functional outcomes, and QOL. PSG with electromyography of the anterior tibialis is the only method available to diagnose PLMD, but this sleep-related movement disorder is rare and should only be evaluated using PSG in the absence of symptoms of other disorders.The evidence is sufficient to determine that the technology results in a meaningful improvement in the net health outcome.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Practice Guidelines and Position Statements

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM; 2005) published practice parameters for polysomnography (PSG) and related procedures.1, AASM made the following recommendations on the use of PSG for nonrespiratory indications (see Table 1).

Table 1. Practice Parameters on PSG for Nonrespiratory Indications
RecommendationGrade
Polysomnography and a multiple sleep latency test performed on the day after the polysomnographic evaluation are routinely indicated in the evaluation of suspected narcolepsyStandard
Common, uncomplicated, noninjurious parasomnias, such as typical disorders of arousal, nightmares, enuresis, sleeptalking, and bruxism, can usually be diagnosed by clinical evaluation aloneStandard
Polysomnography is not routinely indicated in cases of typical, uncomplicated, and noninjurious parasomnias when the diagnosis is clearly delineatedOption
A clinical history, neurologic examination, and a routine EEG obtained while the patients are awake and asleep are often sufficient to establish the diagnosis and permit the appropriate treatment of a sleep-related seizure disorder. The need for a routine EEG should be based on clinical judgment and the likelihood that the patient has a sleep-related seizure disorder.Option
Polysomnography is not routinely indicated for patients with a seizure disorder who have no specific complaints consistent with a sleep disorderOption
Polysomnography is indicated when evaluating patients with sleep behaviors suggestive of parasomnias that are unusual or atypical because of the patient's age at onset; the time, duration or frequency of occurrence of the behavior; or the specifics of the particular motor patterns in questionGuideline
Polysomnography … is indicated in evaluating sleep-related behaviors that are violent or otherwise potentially injurious to the patient or othersOption
Polysomnography may be indicated in situations with forensic considerations (e.g., if onset follows trauma or if the events themselves have been associated with personal injury)Option
Polysomnography may be indicated when the presumed parasomnia or sleep-related seizure disorder does not respond to conventional therapyOption
Polysomnography is indicated when a diagnosis of periodic limb movement disorder is considered because of complaints by the patient or an observer of repetitive limb movement during sleep and frequent awakenings, fragmented sleep, difficulty maintaining sleep, or excessive daytime sleepinessStandard
Intra-individual night-to-night variability exists in patients with periodic limb movement sleep disorder, and a single study might not be adequate to establish this diagnosisOption
Polysomnography is not routinely indicated to diagnose or treat restless legs syndrome, except where uncertainty exists in the diagnosisStandard
Polysomnography is not routinely indicated for the diagnosis of circadian rhythm sleep disordersStandard
EEG: electroencephalography.

The AASM (2017) updated its practice parameters on PSG.8, The update made few recommendation changes to this policy. For narcolepsy, the guidelines note that a clinical history, sleep diaries, PSG, and a multiple sleep latency test are key items in the evaluation of the disorder.

The AASM (2012) published practice parameters on nonrespiratory indications for PSG and multiple sleep latency testing in children.4, Table 2 lists recommendations for PSG and multiple sleep latency testing.

Table 2. Practice Parameters on PSG for Nonrespiratory Indications in Children
RecommendationGrade
PSG is indicated for children suspected of having PLMD for diagnosing PLMDStandard
The MSLT, preceded by nocturnal PSG, is indicated in children as part of the evaluation for suspected narcolepsyStandard
Children with frequent NREM parasomnias, epilepsy, or nocturnal enuresis should be clinically screened for the presence of comorbid sleep disorders, and polysomnography should be performed if there is a suspicion for sleep-disordered breathing or periodic limb movement disorderGuideline
The MSLT, preceded by nocturnal PSG, is indicated in children suspected of having hypersomnia from causes other than narcolepsy to assess excessive sleepiness and to aid in differentiation from narcolepsyOption
The polysomnogram using an expanded EEG montage is indicated in children to confirm the diagnosis of an atypical or potentially injurious parasomnia or differentiate a parasomnia from sleep-related epilepsy when the initial clinical evaluation and standard EEG are inconclusiveOption
Polysomnography is indicated in children suspected of having RLS who require supportive data for diagnosing RLSOption
Polysomnography is not routinely indicated for evaluation of children with sleep-related bruxismStandard
EEG: electroencephalography; MSLT: multiple sleep latency test; NREM: non-rapid eye movement; PLMD: periodic limb movement disorder; PSG: polysomnography; RLS: restless legs syndrome.

The AASM (2012) issued a practice parameter on the treatment of restless legs syndrome and periodic limb movement disorder in adults.3, The practice parameter noted different treatment efficacy measures are used to assess restless legs syndrome due to its multifaceted nature. Measures included a number of subjective scales; the only objective measurements were sleep-related parameters by PSG or actigraphy.

The AASM (2010) issued best practice guide on the treatment of nightmare disorders in adults (classified as a parasomnia).9,The AASM stated that overnight PSG is not routinely used to assess nightmare disorder but may be used to exclude other parasomnias or sleep-disordered breathing. PSG may underestimate the incidence and frequency of posttraumatic stress disorder-associated nightmares.

The AASM (2010) issued best practice guide on the treatment of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD).2, Minimal diagnostic criteria for RBD included:


    "A) Presence of R[EM] sleep without atonia, defined as sustained or intermittent elevation of submental EMG [electromyographic] tone or excessive phasic muscle activity in the limb EMG [electromyography] …;

    B) At least 1 of the following:


      1)Sleep-related injurious or potentially injurious disruptive behaviors by history;

      2)Abnormal R[EM] behaviors documented on polysomnogram (PSG);


    C) Absence of epileptiform activity during R[EM] sleep unless RBD can be clearly distinguished from any concurrent R[EM] sleep-related seizure disorder;

    D) Sleep disturbance not better explained by another sleep disorder, medical or neurological disorder, mental disorder, medication use, or substance use disorder."


U.S. PREVENTIVE SERVICES TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS

Not applicable.

Ongoing and Unpublished Clinical Trials

Some currently unpublished trials that might influence this policy are listed in Table 3.

Table 3. Summary of Key Trials
NCT No.Trial NamePlanned EnrollmentCompletion Date
Ongoing
NCT03047408Evolution of REM Sleep Behavior Disorder in Parkinson's Disease Patients RBD Diagnosed Three Years Earlier
50
Jun 2019
NCT: national clinical trial.]
________________________________________________________________________________________

Horizon BCBSNJ Medical Policy Development Process:

This Horizon BCBSNJ Medical Policy (the “Medical Policy”) has been developed by Horizon BCBSNJ’s Medical Policy Committee (the “Committee”) consistent with generally accepted standards of medical practice, and reflects Horizon BCBSNJ’s view of the subject health care services, supplies or procedures, and in what circumstances they are deemed to be medically necessary or experimental/ investigational in nature. This Medical Policy also considers whether and to what degree the subject health care services, supplies or procedures are clinically appropriate, in terms of type, frequency, extent, site and duration and if they are considered effective for the illnesses, injuries or diseases discussed. Where relevant, this Medical Policy considers whether the subject health care services, supplies or procedures are being requested primarily for the convenience of the covered person or the health care provider. It may also consider whether the services, supplies or procedures are more costly than an alternative service or sequence of services, supplies or procedures that are at least as likely to produce equivalent therapeutic or diagnostic results as to the diagnosis or treatment of the relevant illness, injury or disease. In reaching its conclusion regarding what it considers to be the generally accepted standards of medical practice, the Committee reviews and considers the following: all credible scientific evidence published in peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, physician and health care provider specialty society recommendations, the views of physicians and health care providers practicing in relevant clinical areas (including, but not limited to, the prevailing opinion within the appropriate specialty) and any other relevant factor as determined by applicable State and Federal laws and regulations.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Index:
Polysomnography for Non‒Respiratory Sleep Disorders
Polysomnography for NonRespiratory Sleep Disorders

References:
1. Kushida CA, Littner MR, Morgenthaler T, et al. Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures: an update for 2005. Sleep. Apr 2005;28(4):499-521. PMID 16171294

2. Aurora RN, Zak RS, Maganti RK, et al. Best practice guide for the treatment of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). J Clin Sleep Med. Feb 15 2010;6(1):85-95. PMID 20191945

3. Aurora RN, Kristo DA, Bista SR, et al. The treatment of restless legs syndrome and periodic limb movement disorder in adults--an update for 2012: practice parameters with an evidence-based systematic review and meta-analyses: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline. Sleep. Aug 01 2012;35(8):1039-1062. PMID 22851801

4. Aurora RN, Lamm CI, Zak RS, et al. Practice parameters for the non-respiratory indications for polysomnography and multiple sleep latency testing for children. Sleep. Nov 01 2012;35(11):1467-1473. PMID 23115395

5. Chesson AL, Jr., Ferber RA, Fry JM, et al. The indications for polysomnography and related procedures. Sleep. Jun 1997;20(6):423-487. PMID 9302726

6. Neikrug AB, Ancoli-Israel S. Diagnostic tools for REM sleep behavior disorder. Sleep Med Rev. Oct 2012;16(5):415-429. PMID 22169258

7. Goldstein CA. Parasomnias. Dis Mon. Jul 2011;57(7):364-388. PMID 21807161

8. Kapur VK, Auckley DH, Chowdhuri S, et al. Clinical practice guideline for diagnostic testing for adult obstructive sleep apnea: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Sleep Med. Mar 15 2017;13(3):479-504. PMID 28162150

9. Aurora RN, Zak RS, Auerbach SH, et al. Best practice guide for the treatment of nightmare disorder in adults. J Clin Sleep Med. Aug 15 2010;6(4):389-401. PMID 20726290

Codes:
(The list of codes is not intended to be all-inclusive and is included below for informational purposes only. Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis, drug or device code(s) does not constitute or imply authorization, certification, approval, offer of coverage or guarantee of payment.)

CPT*

    95805
    95808
    95810
    95811
    95782
    95783

HCPCS

* CPT only copyright 2019 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. CPT is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Medical policies can be highly technical and are designed for use by the Horizon BCBSNJ professional staff in making coverage determinations. Members referring to this policy should discuss it with their treating physician, and should refer to their specific benefit plan for the terms, conditions, limitations and exclusions of their coverage.

The Horizon BCBSNJ Medical Policy Manual is proprietary. It is to be used only as authorized by Horizon BCBSNJ and its affiliates. The contents of this Medical Policy are not to be copied, reproduced or circulated to other parties without the express written consent of Horizon BCBSNJ. The contents of this Medical Policy may be updated or changed without notice, unless otherwise required by law and/or regulation. However, benefit determinations are made in the context of medical policies existing at the time of the decision and are not subject to later revision as the result of a change in medical policy

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________